Associate Professor/Reader Homoeopathic Pharmacy — Kerala PSC PYQ Practice with Answers

Browse preview questions from Associate Professor/Reader Homoeopathic Pharmacy. Sign in for timed full-paper practice in the app.

Technical / SpecialHomoeopathy2023English

Paper details

  • Paper code: associate-prof-homoeopathic-pharmacy-175-2023
  • Format: Full previous year paper — PYQ practice with answers

How to open this paper in PSC PYQ

Open the app and navigate: Exam Browse → Associate Professor/Reader Homoeopathic Pharmacy.

Attempt the full paper under timed conditions, then review weak topics using the preview links below or topic-wise practice in the app.

Preview questions (5)

Sample PYQs from this paper with answers and explanations — sign in for the full paper in the app.

Question 1 General Knowledge
Which of the following is not a source of Homoeopathic pharmacy ?\n1. Dispansatorium homoeopathicum\n2. Materia medica pura\n3. Organon of medicine\n4. Chronic diseases
  1. A. 1 and 2 only
  2. B. 3 and 4 only
  3. C. 1 only
  4. D. 4 only

Correct answer: C. 1 only

Correct answer (Option C):\nDispansatorium homoeopathicum is not considered a standard or official foundation source text for Homoeopathic pharmacy. The other foundational texts compiled by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann, including the Materia Medica Pura, Organon of Medicine, and The Chronic Diseases, serve as essential sources that define the principles, drug preparation, and philosophical guidelines of homoeopathic pharmacy practices.\n\nWhy others are wrong:\nOptions A, B, and D include combinations that name Materia Medica Pura, Organon of Medicine, or Chronic Diseases, all of which are genuine, valid historical pillars and sources of homoeopathic pharmacology and pharmacy rules established by Hahnemann.\n\nRemember:\nDr. Samuel Hahnemann authored the 'Materia Medica Pura' and the 'Organon of Medicine', which outlines the core doctrinal laws of the potentization process.
Question 2 General Knowledge
The essay-Medicine of experience deals with
  1. A. Minimum dose
  2. B. External applications
  3. C. 50 millesimal scale
  4. D. Proving drugs on healthy human beings

Correct answer: D. Proving drugs on healthy human beings

Correct answer (Option D):\nThe famous essay 'Medicine of Experience' (Medicine der Erfahrung), published by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann in 1805, extensively details the absolute necessity and method of proving single medicinal substances on healthy human beings to ascertain their pure, unaltered, and specific pathogenic effects prior to therapeutic deployment.\n\nWhy others are wrong:\nOption A refers to the minimum dose concept which evolved later. Option B is incorrect as Hahnemann generally discouraged unmanaged external applications. Option C is wrong because the 50 millesimal scale (LM scale) was introduced much later in the 6th edition of Organon.\n\nRemember:\nThe 'Medicine of Experience' is widely acknowledged as the direct precursor and ideological foundation for the first edition of the 'Organon of Medicine' published in 1810.
Question 3 General Knowledge
Number of drugs described in Fragmenta de viribus medicamentorum positivis sive in sano corpora observatis
  1. A. 12
  2. B. 8
  3. C. 27
  4. D. 47

Correct answer: C. 27

Correct answer (Option C):\nHahnemann's seminal work titled 'Fragmenta de viribus medicamentorum positivis sive in sano corpore humano observatis', published in 1805, compiles the detailed pathogenesis and positive symptoms of 27 specific medicinal drugs observed through systematic provings on healthy individuals.\n\nWhy others are wrong:\nOptions A (12), B (8), and D (47) are mathematically incorrect counts that do not represent the actual number of standard therapeutic substances cataloged in this specific historic Latin text.\n\nRemember:\n'Fragmenta de viribus' is notable for being the very first official collection of homoeopathic drug provings compiled and presented by Samuel Hahnemann.
Question 4 General Knowledge
The person who suggested testing medicines on healthy human beings to know their pure and peculiar effects in deranging health of man, before Samuel Hahnemann.
  1. A. William cullen
  2. B. Albrecht Von Haller
  3. C. Constantine Hering
  4. D. Arabian medicine

Correct answer: B. Albrecht Von Haller

Correct answer (Option B):\nAlbrecht Von Haller, a renowned Swiss physician, anatomist, and physiologist, explicitly suggested that medicines should be systematically tested on healthy human bodies to discover their genuine physiological actions prior to Samuel Hahnemann adopting and systemizing the process into homoeopathy.\n\nWhy others are wrong:\nOption A refers to William Cullen, whose Materia Medica translation sparked Hahnemann's cinchona experiment. Option C is wrong as Constantine Hering was a prominent disciple who came after Hahnemann. Option D is an entirely broad historical system of medicine.\n\nRemember:\nHahnemann explicitly pays tribute to Albrecht Von Haller's pioneering insight regarding healthy human drug testing in the footnotes of Aphorism 108 of the 'Organon of Medicine'.
Question 5 General Knowledge
Which are the names given by Samuel Hahnemann for 50 Millesimal scale ?\n1. Renewed dynamization\n2. Spiritual scale\n3. Infinitismal scale\n4. New altered but perfected method
  1. A. 1 and 2 only
  2. B. 3 and 4 only
  3. C. 1 and 4 only
  4. D. 2 and 3 only

Correct answer: C. 1 and 4 only

Correct answer (Option C):\nIn the 6th edition of the Organon of Medicine, Samuel Hahnemann introduced the 50 Millesimal scale and designated it using terms such as 'renewed dynamization' and a 'new altered but perfected method' to describe its advanced preparation technique over the classic centesimal scale.\n\nWhy others are wrong:\nStatements 2 (Spiritual scale) and 3 (Infinitismal scale) are incorrect designations and were never explicitly used by Hahnemann in his text to formally name this scale, making options A, B, and D incorrect combination selections.\n\nRemember:\nThe 50 Millesimal scale is frequently referred to as the LM scale in general practice, denoting a dilution factor of 1:50,000 per potentization tier.

Frequently asked questions

Browse preview questions on this page, or sign in at https://pscpyq.online/app/ and open the same paper in Exam Browse.
Sign in at PSC PYQ to practice the complete previous year paper with all questions and explanations.

Ready to secure your government job?

Start Associate Professor/Reader Homoeopathic Pharmacy PYQ practice with instant answers and progress tracking.